|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Some
Feedback from the readers -2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Replies | Name/Email | Date | ||
| 9558 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance | Kiran A.D.H. | ||
| 9562 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance | Partha Sircar | ||
| 9565 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance | Kiran A.D.H. | ||
| 9577 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance | surabhi chaudhuri | ||
| 9593 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance [morals] | Bibhuti Kumar Bhattacharyya | ||
| 9594 | Re: Nourishing Mukto-mona and Bengali Renaissance | Kiran A.D.H. |
From: "Ghulam Murshid"
Date: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 am
Subject: Re: [banglarnari] Mukto-mona News
Update [07/02/04]
Dear Abhijit and Charbak,
I have been browsing through
the mail I received during the last fortnight and was fascinated by
the nature of the discussion as well as by the amount of tolerance and
restraints showed by participants, particularly in religious matters.
It seems the name Mukto-Mona does bear some meaning.
However, I thought that the discussions are too wide ranging. I
sincerely believe that fewer topics and more in-depth discussion would
be more useful. Perhaps less politics and more social and cultural
issues, including religious issues would be a better idea.
I noticed that an article on Rokeya was published. In this connection, can I submit one of my articles on Rokeya as well? Interested readers can find it at the following address: www.murshid.co.uk/Rokeya.pdf
I will soon post another article called “Adarshabad O Manusher Samgkat” i.e. Idealism and the Crisis of Humanity. In this article, I argue that idealism has separated humans from other animals. However, when it turns into dogmas it transforms humans back into animals.
More later,
Regards,
Ghulam Murshid
From:
"Abdullah Al Amin"
Date: Wed Mar 10, 2004
2:31 pm
Subject: A question to Mr. Roy
Peace be on those who follow the truth. I hope you are in good health.
I have read some of your writings long ago in NFB and after a few years later I am reading some of them in your homepage. I find the same tone, same accusations. So here I have a small question for you (in fact all others who think bashing religion is cool). Did you not ever find a good point in Islam (or in any other religion for that matter) that you can agree with? If so, would you sometimes mention those good points in your writeups? May be then your writings will look to be more balanced. If not, please do yourself a favor and stop concerning with something that cannot give you anything good and concern yourself with something more meaningful to you.
In this regard I must say that if you really like to learn Islam ( or in any other religion for that matter) you have to ask your questions one-by-one. Ask a question, get the answers, if those suit you then fine, if not then you are right in having doubt in that religion. But if you find an answer that seem to you to be logical, why don't you appreciate it and acknowledge it?
I may reply to some of your questions based on my limited knowledge, but I do not think you will be ever convinced by anybody if you are hell-bent on not seeing eye-to-eye. Anyway I appreciate your efforts to come up with difficult questions trying to get to the truth. In that way you should continue. But if you are not honest with your intentions, you might be losing something.
All the best,
Abdullah Al Amin Tokyo, Japan
Avijit Roy Responds:
Abdullah Al Amin wrote:
Peace be on those who follow the truth. I hope you are in good health. I have read some of your writings long ago in NFB and after a few years later I am reading some of them in your homepage. I find the same tone, same accusations. So here I have a small question for you (in fact all others who think bashing religion is cool). Did you not ever find a good point in Islam (or in any other religion for that matter) that you can agree with? If so, would you sometimes mention those good points in your writeups? May be then your writings will look to be more balanced.
Response:
Response: History reveals that the consequences of beliefs have created mental barriers to understanding and has caused ignorance, misery, violence and war. MM site examines beliefs, faiths and superstitions to help become aware of their methodology and dangerous consequences. Most of the freethinkers like me consider religion to be not only untrue, but harmful as well. It has been used to justify war, slavery, sexism, racism, homophobia, mutilations, intolerance, and oppression of minorities, women and humanists for centuries over centuries. The totalitarianism of religious absolutes chokes progress. You see our homepage like that because we feel in such a way. If you are liberal or claim to be taught by Islamic/religious good teaching, then you have to accept those fact. MM has not been created to publish "balanced" view. MM is not a news media. To propagate balanced view is not our motto. We cannot be balanced or neutral when an option is given to choose between blind faith and reason, progressiveness and superstition, humanism and cruelty, science and dogmatism, right?
Of course Religion also have good side that you might want to point out, but what I want to mention, Religion does not have a monopoly on good deeds. Most modern social and moral progress has been made by people free from religion--including Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Charles Darwin, Margaret Sanger, Albert Einstein, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Edison, Marie Curie, H. L. Mencken, Sigmund Freud, Bertrand Russell, Luther Burbank, Ahmed Shariff, Aroj Ali Matubbar, Humayun Azad and many others who have enriched humanity.
Abdullah Al Amin wrote:
If not, please do yourself a favor and stop concerning with something that cannot give you anything good and concern yourself with something more meaningful to you.
Response:
Don't you think its a bit arrogant to advise what I would do and what not? What if I start advising you in the same way what you would write, and what not? :-)
Abdullah Al Amin wrote:
In this regard I must say that if you really like to learn Islam ( or in any other religion for that matter) you have to ask your questions one- by-one. Ask a question, get the answers, if those suit you then fine, if not then you are right in having doubt in that religion. But if you find an answer that seem to you to be logical, why don't you appreciate it and acknowledge it?
Response:
Please be assured that I am learning and updating myself continuously. Freethinking and Rationalist approach is reasonable for me rather than blind belief. It allows me to do my own thinking. A plurality of individuals thinking, free from restraints of orthodoxy, allows ideas to be tested, discarded or adopted. Whenever I find the answer, I accept- dont worry about that; whereas in your case, you tend to believe without caring any reason. Reason is a tool of critical thought that limits the truth of a statement according to the strict tests of the scientific method. Most of the times believers ignores this truth. They cannot form their opinions about religion independently of tradition, authority, or established belief.
Abdullah Al Amin wrote:
I may reply to some of your questions based on my limited knowledge, but I do not think you will be ever convinced by anybody if you are hell- bent on not seeing eye-to-eye.
Response:
You are most well-come. Be my guest! I know that the store of human knowledge and understanding is constantly growing. Some of today's beliefs will be swept away for better ideas tomorrow just as some of yesterday's ideas have been replaced by today's knowledge. If you can come with a better argument to refute me, why shouldn't I accept?
Abdullah Al Amin wrote:
if you are not honest with your intentions, you might be losing something.
Response:
I think I am honest about my intention. May be that is why I am gaining more than loosing :-)
Thanks a lot for writing in MM.
take care,
Avijit
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful ( on amazan.com) :
Interesting debate, January 23, 2003
| Reviewer: A customer |
The contributors are mainly but not exclusively Bangladeshi, Bengali and Indian and the topics largely concerned with South Asia and religious/secular debate. There are a large number of extreme left contributors who form perhaps the consensus political view. Some quite original and articulate anti-fundamentalist religion voices are well represented although defenders of Islam and Hinduism from critiques are there too.
Overall the site offers a very valuable forum for the free exchange of views which is the essence of the democratic model.
The level of debate ranges from lousy to brilliant and one needs to be a bit patient reading through the articles to find occasionally some quite original and intelligent articles.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Mukto-mona] [Articles] [Recent Debate] [Special Event ] [Moderators] [Forum]